Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Channahon | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,926 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $112,771 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 13,926 in Channahon.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate in Channahon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Channahon | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 85 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Channahon.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 12% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Channahon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Channahon | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Channahon at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 33.1% in Channahon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Channahon | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Channahon.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 14.0% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.