Demographics details for Channahon, IL vs Billings, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Channahon, IL vs Billings, MT.
Data | Channahon | Billings |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,926 | 119,960 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $112,771 | $69,692 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Channahon vs Billings
- The population in Billings is higher at 119,960, compared to 13,926 in Channahon.
- Residents in Channahon have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 37.7 years in Billings.
- Channahon has a higher median income of $112,771 compared to $69,692 in Billings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Channahon at 47.0% compared to 37.0% in Billings.
- The poverty level is higher in Billings at 10%, compared to 4% in Channahon.
- The unemployment rate in Channahon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Billings.
Demographics
Demographics Channahon vs Billings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Channahon | Billings |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 85 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Channahon vs Billings
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Channahon and Billings at 1%.
- Channahon has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 82% in Billings.
- In Billings, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Channahon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Channahon at 12% compared to 7% in Billings.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Billings at 5%, compared to 2% in Channahon.
- In Billings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Channahon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Channahon | Billings |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.1% |
Depression | 20.2% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 22.9% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Channahon vs Billings
- In Billings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.6% in Channahon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Billings at 27.8% versus 20.2% in Channahon.
- Billings has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 13.8% in Channahon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Billings at 22.9% compared to 18.9% in Channahon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Channahon at 33.1% compared to 32.9% in Billings.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Billings at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Channahon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Channahon | Billings |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (72) | 0.3% (321) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (1,945) | 14.7% (17,691) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (544) | 5.4% (6,502) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,663) | 24.8% (29,705) |
Education Levels Comparison: Channahon vs Billings
- A higher percentage of residents in Channahon have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Billings.
- In Billings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 14.0% in Channahon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Billings at 5.4%, compared to 3.9% in Channahon.
- In Billings, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 19.1% in Channahon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.