Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Mason, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Mason, OH.
| Data | Chanhassen | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,224 | 35,520 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $131,633 | $121,082 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Mason
- The population in Mason is higher at 35,520, compared to 26,224 in Chanhassen.
- The median age in Mason is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 40.6 years in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633 compared to $121,082 in Mason.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Chanhassen and Mason at 47.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chanhassen and Mason at 4%.
- Mason has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.4% in Chanhassen.
Demographics
Demographics Chanhassen vs Mason provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chanhassen | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 84 | 74 |
| Asian | 7 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Mason
- In Mason, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 74% in Mason.
- In Mason, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 7% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Mason at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chanhassen at 5% compared to 4% in Mason.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Mason at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chanhassen | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.4% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Mason
- In Mason, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.5% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.8%.
- Mason has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 19.1% in Mason.
- Mason has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mason at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chanhassen | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (31) | 0.5% (183) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,502) | 8.9% (3,151) |
| Less than High School | 1.7% (452) | 3.0% (1,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (11,186) | 40.7% (14,469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Mason
- In Mason, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- In Mason, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.9% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mason at 3.0%, compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 40.7% in Mason.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.