Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Indian head, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Indian head, PA.

Data Chanhassen Indian head
Population 26,224 253
Median Age 40.6 years 35.0 years
Median Income $131,633 $60,000
Married Families 47.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 4% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.0

Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Indian head

  • In Chanhassen, the population is higher at 26,224, compared to 253 in Indian head.
  • Residents in Chanhassen have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 35.0 years in Indian head.
  • Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633 compared to $60,000 in Indian head.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chanhassen at 47.0% compared to 45.0% in Indian head.
  • The poverty level is higher in Indian head at 12%, compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
  • Indian head has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Chanhassen.

Demographics

Demographics Chanhassen vs Indian head provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chanhassen Indian head
Black 1 5
White 84 90
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Indian head

  • In Indian head, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian head at 90% compared to 84% in Chanhassen.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chanhassen at 7% compared to 1% in Indian head.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chanhassen at 3% compared to 2% in Indian head.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chanhassen at 5% compared to 2% in Indian head.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Indian head at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chanhassen Indian head
Mental Health Not Good 11.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 6.4% Data is updating%
Depression 19.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 10.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 20.9% Data is updating%
Obesity 29.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 5.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Indian head

  • More residents in Chanhassen report poor mental health at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chanhassen at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chanhassen at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chanhassen at 29.7% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chanhassen at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chanhassen Indian head
No Schooling 0.1% (31) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 5.7% (1,502) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 1.7% (452) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.7% (11,186) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Indian head

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a high school diploma at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • More residents in Chanhassen have less than a high school education at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.