Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Germantown, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Germantown, TN.
Data | Chanhassen | Germantown |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,224 | 40,816 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 43.5 years |
Median Income | $131,633 | $140,429 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Germantown
- The population in Germantown is higher at 40,816, compared to 26,224 in Chanhassen.
- The median age in Germantown is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 40.6 years in Chanhassen.
- Germantown has a higher median income of $140,429, compared to $131,633 in Chanhassen.
- In Germantown, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 47.0% in Chanhassen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chanhassen and Germantown at 4%.
- The unemployment rate in Chanhassen is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.9% in Germantown.
Demographics
Demographics Chanhassen vs Germantown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chanhassen | Germantown |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 84 | 85 |
Asian | 7 | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Germantown
- In Germantown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Germantown at 85% compared to 84% in Chanhassen.
- The Asian population is larger in Chanhassen at 7% compared to 5% in Germantown.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chanhassen at 3% compared to 2% in Germantown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chanhassen at 5% compared to 3% in Germantown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Germantown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chanhassen | Germantown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.4% | 7.9% |
Depression | 19.8% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 10.1% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 29.7% | 26.5% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Germantown
- In Germantown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Germantown at 22.1% versus 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Germantown has a higher smoking rate at 10.1% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 18.8% in Germantown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chanhassen at 29.7% compared to 26.5% in Germantown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Germantown at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chanhassen | Germantown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (31) | 0.1% (57) |
High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,502) | 5.2% (2,137) |
Less than High School | 1.7% (452) | 1.9% (786) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (11,186) | 47.7% (19,459) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Germantown
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chanhassen and Germantown at 0.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a high school diploma at 5.7% compared to 5.2% in Germantown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Germantown at 1.9%, compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Germantown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 42.7% in Chanhassen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.