Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Forest park, GA.
Data | Chanhassen | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,224 | 19,400 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $131,633 | $41,837 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Forest park
- In Chanhassen, the population is higher at 26,224, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- Residents in Chanhassen have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chanhassen at 47.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- The poverty level is higher in Forest park at 10%, compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- Forest park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Chanhassen.
Demographics
Demographics Chanhassen vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chanhassen | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 55 |
White | 84 | 8 |
Asian | 7 | 6 |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- Chanhassen has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Chanhassen at 7% compared to 6% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest park at 8%, compared to 5% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Forest park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chanhassen | Forest park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.4% | 16.0% |
Depression | 19.8% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 13.3% |
Obesity | 29.7% | 43.0% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chanhassen at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chanhassen | Forest park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (31) | 2.6% (504) |
High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,502) | 18.4% (3,567) |
Less than High School | 1.7% (452) | 21.7% (4,202) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (11,186) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- In Forest park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.