Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Clearfield, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Clearfield, PA.
Data | Chanhassen | Clearfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,224 | 5,868 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $131,633 | $50,485 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Clearfield
- In Chanhassen, the population is higher at 26,224, compared to 5,868 in Clearfield.
- Residents in Chanhassen have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 38.4 years in Clearfield.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633 compared to $50,485 in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chanhassen at 47.0% compared to 28.0% in Clearfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearfield at 13%, compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- Clearfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Chanhassen.
Demographics
Demographics Chanhassen vs Clearfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chanhassen | Clearfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 84 | 94 |
Asian | 7 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Clearfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Clearfield at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clearfield at 94% compared to 84% in Chanhassen.
- The Asian population is larger in Chanhassen at 7% compared to 1% in Clearfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chanhassen at 3% compared to 1% in Clearfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chanhassen at 5% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Clearfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chanhassen | Clearfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.4% | 13.7% |
Depression | 19.8% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 23.8% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 29.7% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Clearfield
- In Clearfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clearfield at 24.4% versus 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Clearfield has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 17.6% in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearfield at 17.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chanhassen | Clearfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (31) | 0.5% (32) |
High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,502) | 27.8% (1,629) |
Less than High School | 1.7% (452) | 5.6% (329) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (11,186) | 14.5% (851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Clearfield
- In Clearfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
- In Clearfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.8% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearfield at 5.6%, compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 14.5% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.