Demographics details for Chanhassen, MN vs Bell gardens, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chanhassen, MN vs Bell gardens, CA.

Data Chanhassen Bell gardens
Population 26,224 37,927
Median Age 40.6 years 31.1 years
Median Income $131,633 $53,935
Married Families 47.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 4% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 6.7

Population Comparison: Chanhassen vs Bell gardens

  • The population in Bell gardens is higher at 37,927, compared to 26,224 in Chanhassen.
  • Residents in Chanhassen have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
  • Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chanhassen at 47.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
  • Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 3.4% in Chanhassen.

Demographics

Demographics Chanhassen vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chanhassen Bell gardens
Black 1 1
White 84 -35
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 99
Two or More Races 5 34
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Bell gardens

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chanhassen and Bell gardens at 1%.
  • Chanhassen has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chanhassen at 7% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 3% in Chanhassen.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 5% in Chanhassen.
  • In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Chanhassen.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chanhassen Bell gardens
Mental Health Not Good 11.8% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 6.4% 17.9%
Depression 19.8% 17.5%
Smoking 10.0% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 20.9% 13.3%
Obesity 29.7% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chanhassen vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chanhassen at 19.8% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bell gardens at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chanhassen Bell gardens
No Schooling 0.1% (31) 4.5% (1,722)
High School Diploma 5.7% (1,502) 16.9% (6,418)
Less than High School 1.7% (452) 60.8% (23,053)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.7% (11,186) 3.9% (1,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Chanhassen vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.1% in Chanhassen.
  • In Bell gardens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chanhassen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.