Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Chandlerville Spanish fork
Population 514 44,102
Median Age 44.8 years 27.4 years
Median Income $42,031 $93,989
Married Families 38.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork

  • The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
  • Residents in Chandlerville have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
  • In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.

Demographics

Demographics Chandlerville vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandlerville Spanish fork
Black Data is updating 1
White 96 80
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 12
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
  • Both Chandlerville and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandlerville Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 10.8%
Depression 22.9% 23.8%
Smoking 18.3% 7.7%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 8.3%
Obesity 35.6% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork

  • More residents in Chandlerville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 22.9% in Chandlerville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandlerville at 35.6% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandlerville Spanish fork
No Schooling 1.0% (5) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 30.9% (159) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 41.2% (212) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.1% (21) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.