Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Chandlerville | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 514 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 44.8 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $42,031 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
- Residents in Chandlerville have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandlerville.
- Chandlerville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.
Demographics
Demographics Chandlerville vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chandlerville | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 96 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Chandlerville and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chandlerville | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.8% |
Depression | 22.9% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Chandlerville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 22.9% in Chandlerville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandlerville at 35.6% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chandlerville | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (5) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 30.9% (159) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 41.2% (212) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (21) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.