Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Mount dora, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Mount dora, FL.

Data Chandlerville Mount dora
Population 514 17,160
Median Age 44.8 years 48.6 years
Median Income $42,031 $65,774
Married Families 38.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Mount dora

  • The population in Mount dora is higher at 17,160, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
  • The median age in Mount dora is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 44.8 years in Chandlerville.
  • Mount dora has a higher median income of $65,774, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
  • In Mount dora, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandlerville.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Chandlerville and Mount dora at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Chandlerville and Mount dora at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Chandlerville vs Mount dora provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandlerville Mount dora
Black Data is updating 13
White 96 65
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Mount dora

  • In Mount dora, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 65% in Mount dora.
  • Both Chandlerville and Mount dora have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Mount dora has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount dora at 7%, compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Mount dora.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandlerville Mount dora
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 11.6%
Depression 22.9% 20.8%
Smoking 18.3% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 15.0%
Obesity 35.6% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Mount dora

  • In Mount dora, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in Chandlerville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 22.9% compared to 20.8% in Mount dora.
  • Mount dora has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 18.3% in Chandlerville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 15.0% in Mount dora.
  • Mount dora has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 35.6% in Chandlerville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Mount dora.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandlerville Mount dora
No Schooling 1.0% (5) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 30.9% (159) 16.5% (2,834)
Less than High School 41.2% (212) 8.2% (1,409)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.1% (21) 25.6% (4,390)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Mount dora

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Mount dora.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 16.5% in Mount dora.
  • More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 8.2% in Mount dora.
  • In Mount dora, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.