Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Markleeville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Markleeville, CA.

Data Chandlerville Markleeville
Population 514 163
Median Age 44.8 years 64.6 years
Median Income $42,031 $93,333
Married Families 38.0% 63.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Markleeville

  • In Chandlerville, the population is higher at 514, compared to 163 in Markleeville.
  • The median age in Markleeville is higher at 64.6 years, compared to 44.8 years in Chandlerville.
  • Markleeville has a higher median income of $93,333, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
  • In Markleeville, the percentage of married families is higher at 63.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • Markleeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.

Demographics

Demographics Chandlerville vs Markleeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandlerville Markleeville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 96 77
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 23
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Markleeville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chandlerville and Markleeville at 0%.
  • Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 77% in Markleeville.
  • Both Chandlerville and Markleeville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Markleeville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chandlerville at 3% compared to 0% in Markleeville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Markleeville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandlerville Markleeville
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 12.0%
Depression 22.9% 23.0%
Smoking 18.3% 15.4%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 17.1%
Obesity 35.6% 30.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Markleeville

  • In Markleeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in Chandlerville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Markleeville at 23.0% versus 22.9% in Chandlerville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Markleeville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Markleeville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandlerville at 35.6% compared to 30.0% in Markleeville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Markleeville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandlerville Markleeville
No Schooling 1.0% (5) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 30.9% (159) 19.6% (32)
Less than High School 41.2% (212) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.1% (21) 35.6% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Markleeville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 19.6% in Markleeville.
  • More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 0.0% in Markleeville.
  • In Markleeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.6% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.