Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Chandlerville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 514 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,031 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
- Residents in Chandlerville have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandlerville at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 12% in Chandlerville.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in Chandlerville.
Demographics
Demographics Chandlerville vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandlerville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 96 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Chandlerville.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 3% in Chandlerville.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Chandlerville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandlerville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Coalinga
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Chandlerville and Coalinga at 16.9%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 22.9% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandlerville at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.6% in Chandlerville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandlerville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (5) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 30.9% (159) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 41.2% (212) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (21) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.0% in Chandlerville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 39.2% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.