Demographics details for Chandlerville, IL vs Cedar falls, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandlerville, IL vs Cedar falls, IA.

Data Chandlerville Cedar falls
Population 514 40,746
Median Age 44.8 years 28.0 years
Median Income $42,031 $71,011
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.9

Population Comparison: Chandlerville vs Cedar falls

  • The population in Cedar falls is higher at 40,746, compared to 514 in Chandlerville.
  • Residents in Chandlerville have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
  • Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011, compared to $42,031 in Chandlerville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandlerville at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
  • Chandlerville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Chandlerville is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.

Demographics

Demographics Chandlerville vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandlerville Cedar falls
Black Data is updating 1
White 96 90
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 3 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Cedar falls

  • In Cedar falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Chandlerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 90% in Cedar falls.
  • In Cedar falls, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Chandlerville.
  • Cedar falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Chandlerville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chandlerville at 3% compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandlerville at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandlerville Cedar falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 9.0%
Depression 22.9% 19.8%
Smoking 18.3% 14.9%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 22.2%
Obesity 35.6% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandlerville vs Cedar falls

  • More residents in Chandlerville report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 22.9% compared to 19.8% in Cedar falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandlerville at 18.3% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 17.8% in Chandlerville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandlerville at 35.6% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandlerville at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandlerville Cedar falls
No Schooling 1.0% (5) 0.1% (43)
High School Diploma 30.9% (159) 9.6% (3,893)
Less than High School 41.2% (212) 2.8% (1,147)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.1% (21) 26.8% (10,913)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandlerville vs Cedar falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandlerville hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
  • More residents in Chandlerville have less than a high school education at 41.2% compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
  • In Cedar falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 4.1% in Chandlerville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.