Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Southington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Southington, CT.

Data Chandler Southington
Population 2,895 43,807
Median Age 40.5 years Data is updating
Median Income $48,168 $Data is updating
Married Families 38.0% Data is updating
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.2

Population Comparison: Chandler vs Southington

  • The population in Southington is higher at 43,807, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
  • Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 0.0 years in Southington.
  • Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168 compared to $0 in Southington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The unemployment rate in Chandler is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.2% in Southington.

Demographics

Demographics Chandler vs Southington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandler Southington
Black 9 Data is updating
White 72 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 13 Data is updating
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Southington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Southington at 100% compared to 72% in Chandler.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 1% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 0% in Southington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Southington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandler Southington
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 24.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Southington

  • More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandler Southington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.9% (691) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.8% (372) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (469) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Southington

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chandler and Southington at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Southington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Southington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.