Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Shelbyville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Shelbyville, TN.
Data | Chandler | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,895 | 24,452 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $48,168 | $50,694 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Shelbyville
- The population in Shelbyville is higher at 24,452, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher median income of $50,694, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- The poverty level is higher in Shelbyville at 15%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Chandler is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chandler | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 11 |
White | 72 | 51 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
American Indian | 3 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 12% in Shelbyville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 2% in Shelbyville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chandler | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.6% |
Depression | 24.6% | 27.5% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 24.6% in Chandler.
- Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 39.4% in Shelbyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Shelbyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chandler | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (185) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 21.6% (5,273) |
Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 20.7% (5,051) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 7.7% (1,889) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 21.6% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 20.7%, compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.