Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Pleasanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Pleasanton, CA.
| Data | Chandler | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 76,689 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $181,639 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasanton
- The population in Pleasanton is higher at 76,689, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Pleasanton is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Pleasanton, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- Pleasanton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Pleasanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 72 | 37 |
| Asian | 2 | 42 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 2% in Pleasanton.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, the Asian population stands at 42%, greater than 2% in Chandler.
- Pleasanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Pleasanton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 7.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 22.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasanton
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasanton at 17.2% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Pleasanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (407) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 6.2% (4,722) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 3.8% (2,941) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 49.3% (37,825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasanton
- In Pleasanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 3.8% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 16.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.