Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Marshall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Marshall, TX.
| Data | Chandler | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 23,641 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $49,162 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 23,641, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $49,162, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 17%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 40 |
| White | 72 | 28 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 11 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Marshall
- In Marshall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 1% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 11% in Marshall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 22.7% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 41.1% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 18.7% (4,412) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 10.7% (2,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 13.2% (3,127) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.