Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Little suamico, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Little suamico, WI.
| Data | Chandler | Little suamico |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 4,878 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $74,800 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 56.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Little suamico
- The population in Little suamico is higher at 4,878, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Little suamico is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
- Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
- The unemployment rate in Chandler is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Little suamico |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 1 |
| White | 72 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Little suamico
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 72% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- Little suamico has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Little suamico.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Little suamico |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Little suamico
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Little suamico |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Little suamico
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chandler and Little suamico at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.