Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Lexington, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Lexington, TN.
| Data | Chandler | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 7,952 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $45,877 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 7,952, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.6 years in Lexington.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168 compared to $45,877 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chandler and Lexington at 13%.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 17 |
| White | 72 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 81% compared to 72% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Chandler and Lexington at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 21.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 30.4% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 30.4% versus 24.6% in Chandler.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 14.4% in Lexington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 39.9% in Lexington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 22.4% (1,783) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 14.6% (1,159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 9.3% (740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 22.4% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 14.6%, compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 9.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.