Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Kannapolis, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Kannapolis, NC.
| Data | Chandler | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 55,448 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $66,487 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Kannapolis
- The population in Kannapolis is higher at 55,448, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Kannapolis.
- Kannapolis has a higher median income of $66,487, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Kannapolis.
- The poverty level is identical in both Chandler and Kannapolis at 13%.
- Kannapolis has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Kannapolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 22 |
| White | 72 | 57 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 57% in Kannapolis.
- Both Chandler and Kannapolis have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Kannapolis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 7% in Kannapolis.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Kannapolis.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Kannapolis
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in Kannapolis.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.6%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 18.9% in Kannapolis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kannapolis at 16.7% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 36.6% in Kannapolis.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Kannapolis.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Kannapolis |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (548) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 15.7% (8,714) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 14.2% (7,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 17.6% (9,747) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Kannapolis
- In Kannapolis, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 15.7% in Kannapolis.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kannapolis at 14.2%, compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- In Kannapolis, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.