Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Harrisonburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Harrisonburg, VA.
Data | Chandler | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,895 | 51,158 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 25.4 years |
Median Income | $48,168 | $56,050 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Harrisonburg
- The population in Harrisonburg is higher at 51,158, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 25.4 years in Harrisonburg.
- Harrisonburg has a higher median income of $56,050, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Harrisonburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Harrisonburg at 18%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
- Harrisonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Harrisonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chandler | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 8 |
White | 72 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 1 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Harrisonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 8% in Harrisonburg.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 56% in Harrisonburg.
- In Harrisonburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Chandler.
- Harrisonburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 12% in Harrisonburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Harrisonburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chandler | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 24.6% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Harrisonburg
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Harrisonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrisonburg at 25.0% versus 24.6% in Chandler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 17.8% in Harrisonburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrisonburg at 16.1% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 36.5% in Harrisonburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Harrisonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chandler | Harrisonburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (768) |
High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 11.1% (5,653) |
Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 15.9% (8,118) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 18.1% (9,247) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Harrisonburg
- In Harrisonburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 11.1% in Harrisonburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrisonburg at 15.9%, compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- In Harrisonburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 16.2% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.