Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Franklin park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Franklin park, IL.

Data Chandler Franklin park
Population 2,895 18,059
Median Age 40.5 years 36.5 years
Median Income $48,168 $74,167
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Chandler vs Franklin park

  • The population in Franklin park is higher at 18,059, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
  • Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.5 years in Franklin park.
  • Franklin park has a higher median income of $74,167, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Franklin park.
  • Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Franklin park.
  • Franklin park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.

Demographics

Demographics Chandler vs Franklin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandler Franklin park
Black 9 1
White 72 10
Asian 2 5
Hispanic 1 59
Two or More Races 13 23
American Indian 3 2

Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Franklin park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 1% in Franklin park.
  • Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
  • In Franklin park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Chandler.
  • Franklin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin park at 23%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 2% in Franklin park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandler Franklin park
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 10.9%
Depression 24.6% 17.7%
Smoking 20.3% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 18.9%
Obesity 41.1% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Franklin park

  • More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 17.7% in Franklin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Franklin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandler Franklin park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.5% (453)
High School Diploma 23.9% (691) 17.0% (3,067)
Less than High School 12.8% (372) 30.2% (5,452)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (469) 12.7% (2,297)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Franklin park

  • In Franklin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 17.0% in Franklin park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin park at 30.2%, compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 12.7% in Franklin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.