Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Christmas valley, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Christmas valley, OR.

Data Chandler Christmas valley
Population 2,895 1,313
Median Age 40.5 years 47.0 years
Median Income $48,168 $46,900
Married Families 38.0% 64.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.5

Population Comparison: Chandler vs Christmas valley

  • In Chandler, the population is higher at 2,895, compared to 1,313 in Christmas valley.
  • The median age in Christmas valley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
  • Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168 compared to $46,900 in Christmas valley.
  • In Christmas valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 64.0%, compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
  • The poverty level is higher in Christmas valley at 15%, compared to 13% in Chandler.
  • Christmas valley has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.

Demographics

Demographics Chandler vs Christmas valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chandler Christmas valley
Black 9 1
White 72 94
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 13 2
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Christmas valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Christmas valley at 94% compared to 72% in Chandler.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 1% in Christmas valley.
  • Christmas valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 2% in Christmas valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Christmas valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chandler Christmas valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 24.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 18.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Christmas valley

  • More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chandler Christmas valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.9% (691) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.8% (372) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.2% (469) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Christmas valley

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chandler and Christmas valley at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Christmas valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.