Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Buckhannon, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Buckhannon, WV.
| Data | Chandler | Buckhannon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 5,106 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $43,621 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Buckhannon
- The population in Buckhannon is higher at 5,106, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Buckhannon.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168 compared to $43,621 in Buckhannon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Buckhannon.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Buckhannon.
- Buckhannon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Buckhannon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Buckhannon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 7 |
| White | 72 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Buckhannon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 9% compared to 7% in Buckhannon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Buckhannon at 84% compared to 72% in Chandler.
- Both Chandler and Buckhannon have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Buckhannon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 3% in Buckhannon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Buckhannon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Buckhannon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 40.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Buckhannon
- In Buckhannon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Buckhannon at 26.1% versus 24.6% in Chandler.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Chandler and Buckhannon at 20.3%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 14.5% in Buckhannon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 40.4% in Buckhannon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Buckhannon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Buckhannon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 20.0% (1,022) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 10.4% (529) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 14.9% (763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Buckhannon
- In Buckhannon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 20.0% in Buckhannon.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 10.4% in Buckhannon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Buckhannon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.