Demographics details for Chandler, OK vs Brighton, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, OK vs Brighton, TN.
| Data | Chandler | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,895 | 2,881 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $48,168 | $76,202 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Brighton
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 2,895, compared to 2,881 in Brighton.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 30.8 years in Brighton.
- Brighton has a higher median income of $76,202, compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Brighton.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Chandler and Brighton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Brighton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 19 |
| White | 72 | 76 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Brighton
- In Brighton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brighton at 76% compared to 72% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Brighton.
- Brighton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 13% compared to 2% in Brighton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 3% compared to 0% in Brighton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 29.1% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Brighton
- In Brighton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brighton at 29.1% versus 24.6% in Chandler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 20.3% compared to 19.3% in Brighton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brighton at 16.5% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 41.1% compared to 39.9% in Brighton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Brighton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (35) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (691) | 18.8% (541) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (372) | 8.8% (253) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (469) | 12.2% (352) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Brighton
- In Brighton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 18.8% in Brighton.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 8.8% in Brighton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 12.2% in Brighton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.