Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Tuscumbia, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Tuscumbia, MO.
| Data | Chandler | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 190 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $44,375 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Tuscumbia
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 190 in Tuscumbia.
- The median age in Tuscumbia is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $44,375 in Tuscumbia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 21.0% in Tuscumbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscumbia at 10%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Tuscumbia has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Tuscumbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 17 |
| White | 48 | 78 |
| Asian | 12 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Tuscumbia
- In Tuscumbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscumbia at 78% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 2% in Tuscumbia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 3% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Tuscumbia
- In Tuscumbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscumbia at 22.2% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Tuscumbia has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tuscumbia at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Chandler.
- Tuscumbia has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Chandler and Tuscumbia at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 17.4% (33) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 18.9% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 4.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Tuscumbia
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Tuscumbia.
- In Tuscumbia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscumbia at 18.9%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 4.7% in Tuscumbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.