Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Redding, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Redding, CA.
| Data | Chandler | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 92,906 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $67,323 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Redding
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 92,906 in Redding.
- The median age in Redding is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $67,323 in Redding.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Redding.
- The poverty level is higher in Redding at 13%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Redding has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Redding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 48 | 71 |
| Asian | 12 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Redding
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 6% compared to 1% in Redding.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Redding at 71% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 4% in Redding.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 12% in Redding.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 10% in Redding.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chandler and Redding at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Redding
- In Redding, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Redding at 22.1% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Redding has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 17.6% in Redding.
- Redding has higher obesity rates at 30.9% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Redding at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Redding |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 0.6% (581) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 14.2% (13,235) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 9.2% (8,540) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 18.3% (16,986) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Redding
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Redding.
- In Redding, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Redding at 9.2%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 18.3% in Redding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.