Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Pleasant hill, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Pleasant hill, CA.
Data | Chandler | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 280,711 | 33,913 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $99,374 | $137,685 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasant hill
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 33,913 in Pleasant hill.
- The median age in Pleasant hill is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685, compared to $99,374 in Chandler.
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- Pleasant hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chandler | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 4 |
White | 48 | 54 |
Asian | 12 | 17 |
Hispanic | 21 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 6% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 54% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- In Pleasant hill, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 12% in Chandler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 14% in Pleasant hill.
- Both Chandler and Pleasant hill have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Pleasant hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chandler | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.1% |
Depression | 18.5% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 8.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 27.9% | 22.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasant hill
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 11.8% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Pleasant hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 27.9% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pleasant hill at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chandler | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 1.4% (469) |
High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 7.5% (2,527) |
Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 5.8% (1,962) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 40.9% (13,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Pleasant hill
- In Pleasant hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 10.1% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 6.8% compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 31.0% in Chandler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.