Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Manhattan, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Manhattan, KS.
| Data | Chandler | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 53,829 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 24.7 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $55,316 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Manhattan
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 53,829 in Manhattan.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 24.7 years in Manhattan.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $55,316 in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Manhattan.
- The poverty level is higher in Manhattan at 15%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Manhattan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Manhattan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 48 | 74 |
| Asian | 12 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Manhattan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 6% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manhattan at 74% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 5% in Manhattan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 8% in Manhattan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 7% in Manhattan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 1% in Manhattan.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Manhattan
- In Manhattan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Manhattan at 20.2% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Manhattan has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manhattan at 20.6% compared to 18.2% in Chandler.
- Manhattan has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manhattan at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Manhattan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 0.5% (256) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 5.8% (3,138) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 4.2% (2,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 26.0% (14,017) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Manhattan
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 10.1% compared to 5.8% in Manhattan.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 6.8% compared to 4.2% in Manhattan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 26.0% in Manhattan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.