Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Lagrange, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Lagrange, GA.
| Data | Chandler | Lagrange |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 31,773 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $41,030 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Lagrange
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 31,773 in Lagrange.
- Residents in Chandler have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.9 years in Lagrange.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $41,030 in Lagrange.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 28.0% in Lagrange.
- The poverty level is higher in Lagrange at 15%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Lagrange has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Lagrange provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Lagrange |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 51 |
| White | 48 | 38 |
| Asian | 12 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Lagrange
- In Lagrange, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 38% in Lagrange.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 3% in Lagrange.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 5% in Lagrange.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 3% in Lagrange.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Lagrange.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Lagrange |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 46.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Lagrange
- In Lagrange, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lagrange at 22.0% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Lagrange has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 13.6% in Lagrange.
- Lagrange has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lagrange at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Lagrange |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 1.0% (314) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 19.7% (6,259) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 11.9% (3,776) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 14.7% (4,682) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Lagrange
- In Lagrange, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- In Lagrange, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lagrange at 11.9%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 14.7% in Lagrange.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.