Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Groveton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Groveton, TX.
| Data | Chandler | Groveton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 922 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $38,333 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Groveton
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 922 in Groveton.
- The median age in Groveton is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $38,333 in Groveton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Groveton.
- The poverty level is higher in Groveton at 18%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Groveton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Groveton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Groveton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 7 |
| White | 48 | 67 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Groveton
- In Groveton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Groveton at 67% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 0% in Groveton.
- Groveton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 21% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 4% in Groveton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Groveton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Groveton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Groveton
- In Groveton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Groveton at 25.7% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Groveton has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 18.0% in Groveton.
- Groveton has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Groveton at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Groveton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 12.7% (117) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 56.1% (517) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 16.6% (153) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Groveton
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Groveton.
- In Groveton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.7% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Groveton at 56.1%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 16.6% in Groveton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.