Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Giddings, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Giddings, TX.
| Data | Chandler | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 5,129 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $63,529 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Giddings
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 5,129 in Giddings.
- The median age in Giddings is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $63,529 in Giddings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chandler at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Giddings.
- The poverty level is higher in Giddings at 10%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Giddings has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Giddings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 11 |
| White | 48 | 24 |
| Asian | 12 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | 2 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Giddings
- In Giddings, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 24% in Giddings.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 1% in Giddings.
- Giddings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 21% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Giddings at 12%, compared to 11% in Chandler.
- In Giddings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 2% in Chandler.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Giddings
- In Giddings, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Giddings at 23.2% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Giddings has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Giddings.
- Giddings has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Giddings at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Giddings |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 26.1% (1,341) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 22.3% (1,143) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 8.8% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Giddings
- In Giddings, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- In Giddings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Giddings at 22.3%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 8.8% in Giddings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.