Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Central point, OR.
| Data | Chandler | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280,711 | 19,222 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $99,374 | $79,731 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Central point
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374 compared to $79,731 in Central point.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 6% in Chandler.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chandler | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 48 | 76 |
| Asian | 12 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 6% compared to 0% in Central point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 15% in Central point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 7% in Central point.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 1% in Central point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chandler | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.4% in Chandler.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 18.5% in Chandler.
- Central point has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 11.8% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Central point has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central point at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chandler | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 1.7% (319) |
| High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 16.1% (3,095) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 13.2% (2,530) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- In Central point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.