Demographics details for Chandler, AZ vs Cedar grove, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chandler, AZ vs Cedar grove, NJ.
Data | Chandler | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 280,711 | 12,549 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $99,374 | $107,500 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 68.2% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Chandler vs Cedar grove
- In Chandler, the population is higher at 280,711, compared to 12,549 in Cedar grove.
- The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Cedar grove has a higher median income of $107,500, compared to $99,374 in Chandler.
- In Cedar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.2%, compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Chandler vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chandler | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1.2 |
White | 48 | 89.5 |
Asian | 12 | 5.2 |
Hispanic | 21 | 3.1 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 1.0 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chandler vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Chandler at 6% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 89.5% compared to 48% in Chandler.
- The Asian population is larger in Chandler at 12% compared to 5.2% in Cedar grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chandler at 21% compared to 3.1% in Cedar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Chandler at 11% compared to 1.0% in Cedar grove.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Chandler at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chandler | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 18.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 11.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 27.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chandler vs Cedar grove
- More residents in Chandler report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chandler at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Chandler at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Chandler at 27.9% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Chandler at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chandler | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,196) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.1% (28,272) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.8% (18,988) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (86,947) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chandler vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a high school diploma at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents in Chandler have less than a high school education at 6.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chandler hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.