Demographics details for Champlin, MN vs Lexington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Champlin, MN vs Lexington, NE.
| Data | Champlin | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,112 | 10,725 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $113,570 | $63,939 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Champlin vs Lexington
- In Champlin, the population is higher at 23,112, compared to 10,725 in Lexington.
- Residents in Champlin have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Champlin has a higher median income of $113,570 compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Champlin at 48.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 9%, compared to 5% in Champlin.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Champlin.
Demographics
Demographics Champlin vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Champlin | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 15 |
| White | 79 | 4 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Champlin vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 10% in Champlin.
- Champlin has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Champlin at 5% compared to 1% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 2% in Champlin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 4% in Champlin.
- In Lexington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Champlin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Champlin | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 12.8% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Champlin vs Lexington
- More residents in Champlin report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Champlin at 24.4% compared to 16.2% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 12.8% in Champlin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Champlin at 21.9% compared to 18.1% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 27.2% in Champlin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Champlin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Champlin | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (117) | 6.2% (660) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (3,460) | 13.6% (1,463) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (528) | 36.3% (3,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (6,049) | 7.3% (779) |
Education Levels Comparison: Champlin vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.5% in Champlin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Champlin hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 2.3% in Champlin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Champlin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.