Demographics details for Champaign, IL vs Eatonton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Champaign, IL vs Eatonton, GA.
| Data | Champaign | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,241 | 6,545 |
| Median Age | 27.0 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $58,273 | $53,870 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Champaign vs Eatonton
- In Champaign, the population is higher at 89,241, compared to 6,545 in Eatonton.
- The median age in Eatonton is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 27.0 years in Champaign.
- Champaign has a higher median income of $58,273 compared to $53,870 in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Champaign.
- Champaign has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 14% in Eatonton.
- The unemployment rate in Champaign is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.9% in Eatonton.
Demographics
Demographics Champaign vs Eatonton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Champaign | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 56 |
| White | 56 | 44 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Champaign vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 17% in Champaign.
- Champaign has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 44% in Eatonton.
- The Asian population is larger in Champaign at 16% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Champaign at 6% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Champaign at 5% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Champaign and Eatonton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Champaign | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Champaign vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Champaign.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eatonton at 20.6% versus 20.2% in Champaign.
- Eatonton has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 15.2% in Champaign.
- Binge drinking is more common in Champaign at 16.0% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Eatonton has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 32.6% in Champaign.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Champaign.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Champaign | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (457) | 0.2% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 7.9% (7,060) | 27.1% (1,772) |
| Less than High School | 5.1% (4,513) | 6.1% (402) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.5% (24,520) | 13.7% (895) |
Education Levels Comparison: Champaign vs Eatonton
- A higher percentage of residents in Champaign have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 7.9% in Champaign.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eatonton at 6.1%, compared to 5.1% in Champaign.
- A higher percentage of residents in Champaign hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.5% compared to 13.7% in Eatonton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.