Demographics details for Chalfont, PA vs Scott city, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Chalfont, PA vs Scott city, MO.

Data Chalfont Scott city
Population 4,283 4,350
Median Age 41.7 years 40.1 years
Median Income $118,871 $57,771
Married Families 40.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 2% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Chalfont vs Scott city

  • The population in Scott city is higher at 4,350, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
  • Residents in Chalfont have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 40.1 years in Scott city.
  • Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871 compared to $57,771 in Scott city.
  • In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
  • The poverty level is higher in Scott city at 9%, compared to 2% in Chalfont.
  • The unemployment rate in Chalfont is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Scott city.

Demographics

Demographics Chalfont vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Chalfont Scott city
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 88 92
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 3
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Chalfont vs Scott city

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Chalfont and Scott city at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Scott city at 92% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
  • The Asian population is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 0% in Scott city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 3% in Scott city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scott city at 5%, compared to 4% in Chalfont.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chalfont and Scott city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Chalfont Scott city
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.8% 15.5%
Depression 22.1% 27.3%
Smoking 12.6% 26.0%
Binge Drinking 20.5% 17.0%
Obesity 29.5% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Chalfont vs Scott city

  • In Scott city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Scott city at 27.3% versus 22.1% in Chalfont.
  • Scott city has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Scott city.
  • Scott city has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scott city at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Chalfont Scott city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (18)
High School Diploma 11.2% (479) 20.4% (886)
Less than High School 2.3% (98) 23.8% (1,035)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.7% (1,830) 10.9% (474)

Education Levels Comparison: Chalfont vs Scott city

  • In Scott city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
  • In Scott city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scott city at 23.8%, compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Chalfont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 10.9% in Scott city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.