Demographics details for Chalfont, PA vs Rockford, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chalfont, PA vs Rockford, IL.
Data | Chalfont | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,283 | 146,713 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $118,871 | $50,744 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Chalfont vs Rockford
- The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
- Residents in Chalfont have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 37.5 years in Rockford.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Chalfont at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.4% in Chalfont.
Demographics
Demographics Chalfont vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chalfont | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 22 |
White | 88 | 46 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chalfont vs Rockford
- In Rockford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 46% in Rockford.
- Both Chalfont and Rockford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 9%, compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chalfont and Rockford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chalfont | Rockford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 13.9% |
Depression | 22.1% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 12.6% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chalfont vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chalfont at 22.1% compared to 21.0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 14.8% in Rockford.
- Rockford has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chalfont | Rockford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (1,781) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (479) | 16.4% (24,126) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (98) | 17.1% (25,088) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (1,830) | 15.5% (22,792) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chalfont vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chalfont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 15.5% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.