Demographics details for Chalfont, PA vs Irving, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chalfont, PA vs Irving, IL.
| Data | Chalfont | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,283 | 370 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $118,871 | $50,000 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 2% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Chalfont vs Irving
- In Chalfont, the population is higher at 4,283, compared to 370 in Irving.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 41.7 years in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871 compared to $50,000 in Irving.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 10%, compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Chalfont.
Demographics
Demographics Chalfont vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Chalfont | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 91 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chalfont vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Irving at 91% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
- The Asian population is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 0% in Irving.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Chalfont and Irving at 4%.
- Both Chalfont and Irving have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chalfont and Irving at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Chalfont | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 12.6% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chalfont vs Irving
- In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Irving at 24.0% versus 22.1% in Chalfont.
- Irving has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 17.3% in Irving.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Irving at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Chalfont | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (479) | 24.9% (92) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (98) | 20.5% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (1,830) | 9.2% (34) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chalfont vs Irving
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Chalfont and Irving at 0.0%.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chalfont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.