Demographics details for Chalfont, PA vs Beacon, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Chalfont, PA vs Beacon, IA.
Data | Chalfont | Beacon |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,283 | 430 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $118,871 | $54,250 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Chalfont vs Beacon
- In Chalfont, the population is higher at 4,283, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Chalfont have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 39.6 years in Beacon.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871 compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- In Beacon, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
- The poverty level is higher in Beacon at 8%, compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Beacon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Chalfont.
Demographics
Demographics Chalfont vs Beacon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Chalfont | Beacon |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 88 | 88 |
Asian | 4 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Chalfont vs Beacon
- In Beacon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Chalfont and Beacon at 88%.
- The Asian population is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 3% in Beacon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Chalfont at 4% compared to 0% in Beacon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beacon at 6%, compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Chalfont and Beacon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Chalfont | Beacon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 9.8% |
Depression | 22.1% | 18.4% |
Smoking | 12.6% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Chalfont vs Beacon
- In Beacon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Chalfont at 22.1% compared to 18.4% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 20.5% in Chalfont.
- Beacon has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beacon at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Chalfont | Beacon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (1) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (479) | 26.3% (113) |
Less than High School | 2.3% (98) | 18.4% (79) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.7% (1,830) | 6.0% (26) |
Education Levels Comparison: Chalfont vs Beacon
- In Beacon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- In Beacon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.3% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beacon at 18.4%, compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Chalfont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.