Demographics details for Ceres, CA vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ceres, CA vs Graceville, FL.
| Data | Ceres | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,988 | 2,175 |
| Median Age | 32.3 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $70,191 | $36,625 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ceres vs Graceville
- In Ceres, the population is higher at 48,988, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Ceres have a higher median age of 32.3 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Ceres has a higher median income of $70,191 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Ceres.
- The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 12% in Ceres.
- The unemployment rate in Ceres is higher at 8.2%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Ceres vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ceres | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 32 |
| White | -3 | 59 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 65 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 26 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ceres vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 2% in Ceres.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Graceville at 59% compared to -3% in Ceres.
- The Asian population is larger in Ceres at 9% compared to 1% in Graceville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ceres at 65% compared to 6% in Graceville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ceres at 26% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ceres at 1% compared to 0% in Graceville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ceres | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ceres vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Ceres.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graceville at 22.2% versus 21.0% in Ceres.
- Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 16.1% in Ceres.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Ceres.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ceres at 35.7% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graceville at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Ceres.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ceres | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.9% (1,891) | 2.7% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (9,225) | 25.3% (550) |
| Less than High School | 29.1% (14,237) | 22.5% (490) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (3,156) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ceres vs Graceville
- A higher percentage of residents in Ceres have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 2.7% in Graceville.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 18.8% in Ceres.
- More residents in Ceres have less than a high school education at 29.1% compared to 22.5% in Graceville.
- In Graceville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 6.4% in Ceres.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.