Demographics details for Centreville, MI vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centreville, MI vs Clarksdale, MS.
Data | Centreville | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,321 | 13,969 |
Median Age | 45.6 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $63,393 | $35,377 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 27% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Centreville vs Clarksdale
- The population in Clarksdale is higher at 13,969, compared to 1,321 in Centreville.
- Residents in Centreville have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Centreville has a higher median income of $63,393 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Centreville at 34.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 10% in Centreville.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 4.5% in Centreville.
Demographics
Demographics Centreville vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Centreville | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 86 |
White | 92 | 9 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centreville vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 4% in Centreville.
- Centreville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both Centreville and Clarksdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Clarksdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Centreville.
- Both Centreville and Clarksdale have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centreville and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Centreville | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 15.8% |
Depression | 25.1% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 50.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centreville vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.8% in Centreville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centreville at 25.1% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 20.1% in Centreville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centreville at 18.5% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 37.1% in Centreville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Centreville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Centreville | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (9) | 2.0% (274) |
High School Diploma | 21.8% (288) | 9.2% (1,281) |
Less than High School | 14.5% (192) | 15.2% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (146) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centreville vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Centreville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centreville hold a high school diploma at 21.8% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 14.5% in Centreville.
- In Clarksdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 11.1% in Centreville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.