Demographics details for Centre, AL vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centre, AL vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Centre | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,664 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 54.5 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,924 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Centre vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 3,664 in Centre.
- Residents in Centre have a higher median age of 54.5 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $41,924 in Centre.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 31.0% in Centre.
- Centre has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Centre.
Demographics
Demographics Centre vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centre | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 81 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Centre vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centre at 15% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Centre has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Centre.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 1% in Centre.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 3% in Centre.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Centre.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centre | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centre vs Taylorsville
- More residents in Centre report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.8% in Taylorsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 26.4% in Centre.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centre at 22.6% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centre at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centre at 38.4% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centre at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centre | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (100) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (651) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 29.0% (1,063) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (398) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centre vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Centre have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centre hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- More residents in Centre have less than a high school education at 29.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 10.9% in Centre.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.