Environment details: Centralia WA
Average quality; urban runoff affects levels.
Environment details: White house TN
acceptable quality; local variances noted.
Compare Environment: Centralia WA vs White house TN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Centralia | White house |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 590 | 741 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Average quality; urban runoff affects levels. | acceptable quality; local variances noted. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.5 | 1.66 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 16 | 36 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Centralia vs White house
- The water quality in White house is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Centralia.
- White house has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Centralia.
- Air quality is better in White house with an average index of 1.66 compared to 1.5 in Centralia.
- White house experiences more days with poor air quality at 36 compared to 16 in Centralia.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.