Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Wallsburg, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Wallsburg, UT.
| Data | Centralia | Wallsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 297 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $99,500 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Wallsburg
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 18,773, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
- The median age in Wallsburg is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
- Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- In Wallsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Wallsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Wallsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 1% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wallsburg at 93% compared to 70% in Centralia.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 1% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 7% in Wallsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Wallsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Wallsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 9.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Wallsburg
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 22.8% in Wallsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 13.2% in Wallsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 36.5% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Wallsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Wallsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 27.6% (82) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 7.4% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 9.4% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Wallsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
- In Wallsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 17.6% in Centralia.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.