Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Valdosta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Valdosta, GA.
Data | Centralia | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,773 | 55,074 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 29.2 years |
Median Income | $50,422 | $41,365 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Valdosta
- The population in Valdosta is higher at 55,074, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Centralia has a higher median income of $50,422 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Centralia at 28.0% compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 14% in Centralia.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.1% in Valdosta.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Centralia | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 56 |
White | 70 | 34 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 17 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- Both Centralia and Valdosta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Valdosta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Centralia | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.4% |
Depression | 27.5% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 36.5% | 43.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Centralia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 19.2% in Centralia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Centralia | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 1.0% (538) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 16.3% (8,967) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 8.9% (4,906) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 15.9% (8,750) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Valdosta
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Valdosta.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 8.9% in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.