Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Penngrove, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Penngrove, CA.
| Data | Centralia | Penngrove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 2,184 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 59.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $97,237 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Penngrove
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 18,773, compared to 2,184 in Penngrove.
- The median age in Penngrove is higher at 59.0 years, compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
- Penngrove has a higher median income of $97,237, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- In Penngrove, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Penngrove.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Penngrove.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Penngrove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Penngrove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 60 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Penngrove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Centralia at 1% compared to 0% in Penngrove.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 60% in Penngrove.
- In Penngrove, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Centralia.
- Penngrove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 17% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 9% in Penngrove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Penngrove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Penngrove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 12.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Penngrove
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.6% in Penngrove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 21.9% in Penngrove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 12.5% in Penngrove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Penngrove at 20.4% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 36.5% compared to 28.8% in Penngrove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Penngrove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Penngrove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 1.0% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 7.3% (160) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 7.4% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 35.2% (769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Penngrove
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Penngrove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 7.3% in Penngrove.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 7.4% in Penngrove.
- In Penngrove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.2% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.