Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Murfreesboro, TN.
| Data | Centralia | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 162,398 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $70,451 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Murfreesboro
- The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher median income of $70,451, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 17 |
| White | 70 | 66 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 66% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Centralia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Murfreesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Murfreesboro
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.1% in Murfreesboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 26.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Murfreesboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 36.5% compared to 34.8% in Murfreesboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 0.6% (920) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 10.7% (17,362) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 6.2% (10,101) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.