Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Centralia | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Fairmont
- In Centralia, the population is higher at 18,773, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher median income of $50,422 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Centralia at 28.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 14% in Centralia.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Fairmont.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 62 |
| White | 70 | 14 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Centralia at 1% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Centralia at 17% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Centralia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Centralia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 19.2% in Centralia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 19.0% in Centralia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 17.6% in Centralia.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 12.9% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.