Demographics details for Centralia, WA vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Centralia, WA vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Centralia | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,773 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,422 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Centralia vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- Residents in Centralia have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The unemployment rate in Centralia is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.9% in Cedar hill.
Demographics
Demographics Centralia vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Centralia | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 51 |
| White | 70 | 11 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Centralia vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Centralia.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 17% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Centralia at 11% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Centralia and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Centralia | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Centralia vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Centralia report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Centralia at 27.5% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Centralia at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 15.9% in Centralia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Centralia at 36.5% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Centralia | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (214) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (3,312) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (3,617) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (2,187) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Centralia vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Centralia hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Centralia have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.6% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.